Skip to content

EOEP-5 Industry Consultation Workshop: Presentations & Summary Report

ESA in cooperation with EARSC held this Industry Consultation workshop. Conclusions will actively take part in shaping the 5th ESA Earth Observation Envelope Program, planned to start early 2017.

The EO satellite sector is evolving rapidly, both in terms of data availability and new commercial initiatives. Copernicus, the world’s first operational multi-platform EO programme is becoming a reality with four Sentinel satellites already in orbit. New and innovative satellite operators are entering the market especially in the US, new data sources are emerging – including unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and crowd or citizen sources using mobile technologies. Large IT companies such as Google and Amazon are seeking to establish global, geospatial initiatives (eg. Terra Bella).

Europe has an active and vibrant EO services sector, with over 500 companies spread through the Member States making over €900m revenues and generating nearly 7000 highly skilled jobs in 2014. Most of these companies are very small, but represent a highly skilled industry providing leading-edge EO-based products & services. The challenge will be to nourish these capabilities and ensure competitiveness and growth in the European and global market-place over the years to come.

In the Earth Observation Envelope Program (EOEP5) proposal to the 2016 ESA ministerial meeting, ESA is introducing elements aimed at addressing these challenges for the period 2017-2021, and will present the plans for discussion. ‘EO-Innovation Europe’ will address key enabling technologies such as application platforms, while other elements will focus on expanding use of EO and uptake within key demand sectors. A first consultation meeting between ESA and EARSC was held in September 2015 focusing on the exchange of ideas for the creation of a new environment for EO data exploitation and innovation in Europe, in line with the new ground segment evolution strategy. These discussions have continued and the latest status will be reviewed,

The objectives of this Industry Consultation were to discuss the following issues :

  • ESA’s current plans and proposals for activities under EOEP5
  • Which user sectors (public and private) offer the greatest opportunity to expand and grow demand for what types of EO-based information?
  • Develop a common understanding with respect to key enabling technologies required to support the European EO service sector
  • What support actions are required from ESA for Industry to fully realize these opportunities (short-term, mid-term)?

Summary of discussions

Here follows a summary of the discussion that took place in the afternoon session, which was mainly focused on EO based services and user uptake

  • The importance of end user involvement. It was considered important that ESA play a role in federating user communities in order to support companies and organizations trying to develop a sustainable business based upon EO platforms. ESA has the potential to leverage EO towards large public and private user organizations way beyond the individual capabilities of SMEs, and this should be continues in EOEP5. Having the user pull will also be important for consolidating the requirements on which the EO platforms will be developed.
  • Importance of commercial data for operational services: Even thought the amount of freely available EO data is increasing rapidly (especially because of the Sentinels) and is made available via platforms such as GEE and Amazon Web services it was emphasized that many EO based services also require data from commercial satellites in order to meet user requirements, and these data are not available via these platforms.
  • Sentinel data availability via the Sci-hub: Several participants explained that the Sentinel data can be downloaded from the ESA data hub if done in the right way, i.e. using scripts that automate the download interface procedure. These scripts are now available on the web and in theory could be used by anyone.
  • ESA funding mechanisms: Different types of funding mechanisms could be suitable for differ phases of a product development cycle. I.e. early phase exploratory prototype developments will need to smaller, faster procurements, while EO service developments involving end users will require larger and longer terms funding mechanisms.
  • Boot camps and innovation labs: It was emphasized that suitable boot camps initiatives exist and that inventing new ones could be counterproductive. One should instead try to build upon those that exist and take benefit from existing infrastructure, communities and capabilities.
  • Industry role in science: Industry expressed the wish to be even more present in ESA EOEP5 science focused elements, in order to ensure that industry can better take advantage of cutting edge development that would otherwise remain within the science community of universities and institutions.


Some lessons learned from the meeting:

  • The large number of attendees shows the interest to have such a meeting on a regular basis. Feedback afterwards suggested more interaction would have been welcomed.
  • This meeting followed the first one of this type held with ESA ground segment in September 2015.
  • Despite leaving time on the agenda, in the end there was not enough time to discuss as much as would have been liked. Feedback came from some participants that they would have liked more exchange. This was certainly inhibited by being in the large hall which is not a good setting for discussion.
  • Some questions were developed during the meeting and feedback was requested by ESA afterwards. A short survey for attendees to complete would have sharpened up some of the impressions of the meeting.
  • An annual, open meeting has been foreseen with ESA. This first event with all the ESA-ESRIN partners showed the desire to have such an opportunity to really exchange more than an information day. Whilst this event fell at the time to consult on EOEP5, future meetings can take other topics as a framework for discussion. At the heart, should always be an exchange on the current issues concerning ESA and industry.